People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn
38 Mich. 313, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 70
Opinion
Where a writ of replevin is dismissed [314] by a justice, and defendant waives return, he has a right to introduce evidence to prove the value of the property, and mandamus will issue to compel the justice to receive it,' in case, he refuses to allow it. People v. Tripp, 15 Mich., 518; People ex rel. Forbes v. Judge of Washtenaw Circ. Ct., 23 Mich., 497.
■ Costs will not be granted against a party interested who has not been brought before this court by notice, in such a case.
Mandamus granted, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn, 38 Mich. 313, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 70 (Mich. 1878).
38 Mich. 313 (People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manchure v. Wayside Oil Corp.
244 N.W. 224 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)
McLeod v. Scott
29 P. 1 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)