People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn

Michigan Supreme Court

People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn

38 Mich. 313, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 70

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 Mich. 313 (People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. La Barr v. Osborn, 38 Mich. 313, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 70 (Mich. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where a writ of replevin is dismissed [314]*314by a justice, and defendant waives return, he has a right to introduce evidence to prove the value of the property, and mandamus will issue to compel the justice to receive it,' in case, he refuses to allow it. People v. Tripp, 15 Mich., 518; People ex rel. Forbes v. Judge of Washtenaw Circ. Ct., 23 Mich., 497.

■ Costs will not be granted against a party interested who has not been brought before this court by notice, in such a case.

Mandamus granted, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Where a writ of replevin is dismissed [314]*314by a justice, and defendant waives return, he has a right to introduce evidence to prove the value of the property, and mandamus will issue to compel the justice to receive it,' in case, he refuses to allow it. People v. Tripp, 15 Mich., 518; People ex rel. Forbes v. Judge of Washtenaw Circ. Ct., 23 Mich., 497.

■ Costs will not be granted against a party interested who has not been brought before this court by notice, in such a case.

Mandamus granted, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Mich. 313, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-la-barr-v-osborn-mich-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack