People ex rel. Kurzynski v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Kurzynski v. Hunt

257 A.D. 1032, 13 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8964

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: “ The action of the Parole Board in revoking relator’s parole, and in ordering him returned to prison, is not subject to review in this proceeding.” (People ex rel. Kurzynski v. Hunt, 250 App. Div. 378.) Had relator not waived extradition proceedings and consented to return voluntarily, he could have been extradited as a fugitive from justice. (People ex rel. Hutchings v. Mallon, 218 App. Div. 461, 465, 468; affd., 245 N. Y. 521.) The means employed to return the relator to this State do not relate to the restraint from which he seeks to be relieved. Hence, his return to this State, even if unlawful, does not make his imprisonment illegal. (People v. Dileo, 194 App. Div. 793, 794, and cases cited; Pettibone v. Nichols, 203 U. S. 192.) All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator into custody.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: “ The action of the Parole Board in revoking relator’s parole, and in ordering him returned to prison, is not subject to review in this proceeding.” (People ex rel. Kurzynski v. Hunt, 250 App. Div. 378.) Had relator not waived extradition proceedings and consented to return voluntarily, he could have been extradited as a fugitive from justice. (People ex rel. Hutchings v. Mallon, 218 App. Div. 461, 465, 468; affd., 245 N. Y. 521.) The means employed to return the relator to this State do not relate to the restraint from which he seeks to be relieved. Hence, his return to this State, even if unlawful, does not make his imprisonment illegal. (People v. Dileo, 194 App. Div. 793, 794, and cases cited; Pettibone v. Nichols, 203 U. S. 192.) All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator into custody.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

People ex rel. Kurzynski v. Hunt, 257 A.D. 1032, 13 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 1032 (People ex rel. Kurzynski v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related