People ex rel. Krieger v. Board of Excise

New York City Court

People ex rel. Krieger v. Board of Excise

18 N.Y.S. 959, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 937

DecidedFebruary 23, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 18 N.Y.S. 959 (People ex rel. Krieger v. Board of Excise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Krieger v. Board of Excise, 18 N.Y.S. 959, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 937 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator applied to the board of excise for a saloon license. Upon mandamus proceedings had before the special term of this court,, under Laws 1886, c. 496, the trial judge decided on the proofs that the application was made to the board in due form, and that the board arbitrarily, and without good cause, reason, or excuse, refused and still refuses to grant such license. After careful examination of the case, we see no reason to disturb* these findings of facts. Order must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The relator applied to the board of excise for a saloon license. Upon mandamus proceedings had before the special term of this court,, under Laws 1886, c. 496, the trial judge decided on the proofs that the application was made to the board in due form, and that the board arbitrarily, and without good cause, reason, or excuse, refused and still refuses to grant such license. After careful examination of the case, we see no reason to disturb* these findings of facts. Order must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 N.Y.S. 959, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-krieger-v-board-of-excise-nycityct-1892.