People ex rel. Kotschau v. Waldo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Kotschau v. Waldo

163 A.D. 972, 148 N.Y.S. 1137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 972 (People ex rel. Kotschau v. Waldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Kotschau v. Waldo, 163 A.D. 972, 148 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and relator reinstated. In the opinion of this court the evidence against the relator, considered in the light of testimony produced by him from disinterested witnesses, and which remained uncontradicted in the ease, failed to prove preponderantly a willful and conscious violation of duty by the relator. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and relator reinstated. In the opinion of this court the evidence against the relator, considered in the light of testimony produced by him from disinterested witnesses, and which remained uncontradicted in the ease, failed to prove preponderantly a willful and conscious violation of duty by the relator. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 972, 148 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kotschau-v-waldo-nyappdiv-1914.