People ex rel. Knowles v. Scully
This text of 101 A.D.2d 895 (People ex rel. Knowles v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated July 14, 1983, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ and remanded petitioner to the custody of respondent, f Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, f As the relief requested by petitioner would not result in his immediate release, the remedy of habeas corpus is not available. Should petitioner wish to pursue his claim that jail time should be credited toward his sentence, he may seek such relief in an appropriate proceeding (see People ex rel. Mendolia v Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, 47 NY2d 779; People ex rel. Lane v Vincent, 32 NY2d 940; People ex rel. Collier v Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, 72 AD2d 612). Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Fiber JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.2d 895, 476 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-knowles-v-scully-nyappdiv-1984.