People Ex Rel. Kneitel v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Facility

120 A.D.3d 1274, 991 N.Y.S.2d 774
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 10, 2014
Docket2014-07813
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1274 (People Ex Rel. Kneitel v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Kneitel v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, 120 A.D.3d 1274, 991 N.Y.S.2d 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application pursuant to CPL 170.70 to release the defendant in a criminal action entitled People v Robinson, commenced in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, under Docket No. 2014KN060754. Application by the Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., for leave to serve and file an amicus curiae brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application for leave to serve and file an amicus curiae brief, and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

Ordered that the application for leave to serve and file an amicus curiae brief is denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The arguments raised in connection with this writ of habeas corpus have been rendered academic, as the detainee on whose behalf the writ is sought has been released from custody (see People ex rel. Kneitel v Warden, Rikers Is. Corr. Facility, 104 AD3d 795, 796 [2013]). Furthermore, under the circumstances of this case, review of the issues raised by the petitioner is not warranted under the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]; People ex rel. Kneitel v Warden, Rikers Is. Corr. Facility, 104 AD3d at 796; People ex rel. Crow v Warden, Anna M. Kross Detention Ctr., 76 AD3d 646 [2010]). Accordingly, the writ is dismissed as academic.

Balkin, J.E, Leventhal, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Smith v. Fields
2020 NY Slip Op 07213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People ex rel. Booth v. Warden, Otis Bantum Corr. Ctr.
2018 NY Slip Op 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D.3d 1274, 991 N.Y.S.2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kneitel-v-warden-rikers-island-correctional-facility-nyappdiv-2014.