People ex rel. Kitchen v. White

158 A.D.2d 437, 552 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2111
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

After a bench trial, appellant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon, in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. He thereafter brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that he had been denied his statutory right to testify before the Grand Jury. A writ of habeas corpus is an inappropriate method to review issues which may be raised on direct appeal. (People ex rel. Goss v Smith, 69 NY2d 727.) Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Kitchen v. White, 158 A.D.2d 437, 552 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 437 (People ex rel. Kitchen v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Global Supplies v. Electrolux
Second Circuit, 2022
People ex rel. Allah v. Lorquet
30 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People ex rel. Heinrich v. Sielaff
176 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)