People ex rel. Kirkham v. Cotes

1 How. Pr. 160
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 160 (People ex rel. Kirkham v. Cotes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Kirkham v. Cotes, 1 How. Pr. 160 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

The main question arose under the 39th section of the act of the 4th of April, 1837. No notice was served, as required by that section; but while the surplus was in the hands of the commissioners, they had actual notice of all the facts, and an order for the surplus was presented, and the money demanded.

Bronson, Chief Justice.

Allowed an alternative mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kirkham-v-cotes-nysupct-1845.