People ex rel. King v. Wayne Circuit Judge
49 N.W. 925, 41 Mich. 727
Opinion
We think the circuit judge was sufficiently liberal in permitting such amendments as he allowed in this case, and that there was no excess of authority or abuse of discretion in the action now complained of. We cannot, therefore, interfere with it. ■
Mandamus denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. King v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 49 N.W. 925, 41 Mich. 727 (Mich. 1879).
49 N.W. 925 (People ex rel. King v. Wayne Circuit Judge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State
921 N.W.2d 247 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2018)
Baker v. Michigan Mutual Protective Ass'n
76 N.W. 970 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
St. Clair Tunnel Co. v. St. Clair Circuit Judge
72 N.W. 249 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)