People ex rel. Kimbrough v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Kimbrough v. Scully

137 A.D.2d 736, 524 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1645

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 137 A.D.2d 736 (People ex rel. Kimbrough v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Kimbrough v. Scully, 137 A.D.2d 736, 524 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1645 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, James Kimbrough appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Donovan, J.), dated May 2, 1986, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[737]*737We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have examined the appellant’s supplemental pro se brief, and find that it contains no meritorious arguments. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, James Kimbrough appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Donovan, J.), dated May 2, 1986, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[737]*737We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

We have examined the appellant’s supplemental pro se brief, and find that it contains no meritorious arguments. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.D.2d 736, 524 N.Y.S.2d 376, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kimbrough-v-scully-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack