People ex rel. Kim v. Commissioner of Corrections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Kim v. Commissioner of Corrections

30 A.D.3d 549, 816 N.Y.S.2d 365

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.3d 549 (People ex rel. Kim v. Commissioner of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Kim v. Commissioner of Corrections, 30 A.D.3d 549, 816 N.Y.S.2d 365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Queens County indictment No. 1888/05.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reducing bail on Queens County indictment No. 1888/05 from the sum of $100,000 to the sum of $25,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum [550]*550as a cash bail alternative, and upon (1) condition that the petitioner refrain from operating a motor vehicle while released on bail, and (2) any conditions previously imposed by the Supreme Court, Queens County, in conjunction with the original bail set on Queens County indictment No. 1888/05; in the event that the bail of $25,000, which was previously set, has not been exonerated and returned to the person who posted it, then, the bail already posted shall satisfy the $25,000 bail required. Crane, J.E, Luciano, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to reduce bail upon Queens County indictment No. 1888/05.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of reducing bail on Queens County indictment No. 1888/05 from the sum of $100,000 to the sum of $25,000, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing the same sum [550]*550as a cash bail alternative, and upon (1) condition that the petitioner refrain from operating a motor vehicle while released on bail, and (2) any conditions previously imposed by the Supreme Court, Queens County, in conjunction with the original bail set on Queens County indictment No. 1888/05; in the event that the bail of $25,000, which was previously set, has not been exonerated and returned to the person who posted it, then, the bail already posted shall satisfy the $25,000 bail required. Crane, J.E, Luciano, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.3d 549, 816 N.Y.S.2d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kim-v-commissioner-of-corrections-nyappdiv-2006.