People ex rel. Kilgallon v. Nuhn

156 N.Y.S. 1151, 173 A.D. 895, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9721

This text of 156 N.Y.S. 1151 (People ex rel. Kilgallon v. Nuhn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Kilgallon v. Nuhn, 156 N.Y.S. 1151, 173 A.D. 895, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We think that the disposition made by the Special Term was right. The opinion of Maddox, J., who presided in that court, renders any discussion by us unnecessary. The opinion as printed in the record states that Browning, King & Co. v. Chamberlain, 150 App. Div. 392, 134 N. Y. Supp. 1104, was affirmed in 210 N. Y. 270, 104 N. E. 627. This was probably a slip of the pen. That case was reversed. See 210 N. Y. 270-274, 104 N. E. 627. The order of the Special Term is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Browning, King Co. v. . Chamberlain
104 N.E. 627 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
Browning, King & Co. v. Chamberlain
150 A.D. 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.Y.S. 1151, 173 A.D. 895, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kilgallon-v-nuhn-nyappdiv-1916.