People ex rel. Kammeyer v. Anderson
This text of 241 A.D. 819 (People ex rel. Kammeyer v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the application for a peremptory order of mandamus unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion, on authority of Ashton v. City of Rochester (133 N. Y. 187); Peoples Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Oswego, No. 1 (207 App. Div. 134); Freeman Judgments [5th ed.], p. 956.) Appellant failed to intervene in the Flannery proceeding. Appeal from order denying motion for resettlement dismissed. In reaching a conclusion in this case we assume the petition presented to the town board was in due order. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-kammeyer-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1934.