People ex rel. Julius Tishman & Sons, Inc. v. Purdy

179 A.D. 754, 167 N.Y.S. 95, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8012

This text of 179 A.D. 754 (People ex rel. Julius Tishman & Sons, Inc. v. Purdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Julius Tishman & Sons, Inc. v. Purdy, 179 A.D. 754, 167 N.Y.S. 95, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Scott, J.:

For the reasons stated in People ex rel. Soeurbee, Inc., v. Purdy (179 App. Div. 748), decided herewith, the order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with costs.

Clarke, P. J., and Dowling, J., concurred; Smith and Page, JJ., dissented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Soeurbee, Inc. v. Purdy
179 A.D. 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D. 754, 167 N.Y.S. 95, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-julius-tishman-sons-inc-v-purdy-nyappdiv-1917.