People ex rel. Jacobs v. Jacobs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Jacobs v. Jacobs

38 A.D.2d 715, 329 N.Y.S.2d 775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 715 (People ex rel. Jacobs v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Jacobs v. Jacobs, 38 A.D.2d 715, 329 N.Y.S.2d 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 27, 1971, which inter alia awarded custody of the child in question to relator. Judgment affirmed, without costs; however, operation and execution of the decretal provision awarding custody of the child to relator is stayed until the termination of the child’s current school semester, which terminates at or about the end of January, 1972. In our opinion the Special Term’s determination as to custody is supported by the record; however, the interests of the child would best be served by staying the operation of the custody provision, so as not to effect an undue interruption of his schooling. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 27, 1971, which inter alia awarded custody of the child in question to relator. Judgment affirmed, without costs; however, operation and execution of the decretal provision awarding custody of the child to relator is stayed until the termination of the child’s current school semester, which terminates at or about the end of January, 1972. In our opinion the Special Term’s determination as to custody is supported by the record; however, the interests of the child would best be served by staying the operation of the custody provision, so as not to effect an undue interruption of his schooling. Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 715, 329 N.Y.S.2d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-jacobs-v-jacobs-nyappdiv-1972.