People ex rel. Ives v. Circuit Judge
40 Mich. 63, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 495
This text of 40 Mich. 63 (People ex rel. Ives v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People ex rel. Ives v. Circuit Judge, 40 Mich. 63, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 495 (Mich. 1879).
Opinion
Mandamus will not lie to compel a circuit court to proceed to trial when a bill has been filed and injunction allowed to restrain it. The sufficiency of the bill cannot be reviewed collaterally, whether the bill is in the same or another court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Martin
1927 OK 147 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)
Geddis v. Wayne Circuit Judge
114 N.W. 874 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
State ex rel. Moore v. Board of Commissioners
68 N.E. 295 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 Mich. 63, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-ives-v-circuit-judge-mich-1879.