People ex rel. Irizarry v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Irizarry v. Fay

13 A.D.2d 530, 214 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12000

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 530 (People ex rel. Irizarry v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Irizarry v. Fay, 13 A.D.2d 530, 214 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy_ on the Attorney-General. Motion by appellant to extend his time to perfect the appeal granted; time extended to the September Term, beginning September 6, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order dismissing, without a hearing, appellant’s habeas corpus proceeding. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to-be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy_ on the Attorney-General. Motion by appellant to extend his time to perfect the appeal granted; time extended to the September Term, beginning September 6, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order dismissing, without a hearing, appellant’s habeas corpus proceeding. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to-be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 530, 214 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-irizarry-v-fay-nyappdiv-1961.