People ex rel. Interdonato v. Warden-Executive Director

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Interdonato v. Warden-Executive Director

95 A.D.2d 700, 464 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18600

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 A.D.2d 700 (People ex rel. Interdonato v. Warden-Executive Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Interdonato v. Warden-Executive Director, 95 A.D.2d 700, 464 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard E. Goldfluss, J.), entered May 3, 1983 denying petitioners’ application for the fixation of bail, deemed by the court to be a writ of habeas corpus seeking their release from detention or in the alternative fixing reasonable bail, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. The application was addressed to the felony complaint which petitioners had waived to the Supreme Court. While this appeal was pending, petitioners were indicted for crimes based on the charges specified in the underlying felony complaint. Appellants are thus no longer held pursuant to the felony complaint but instead under the Grand Jury indictment. Accordingly their objection to the original detention is academic (see People ex rel. Hodge v Fischer, 33 AD2d 956). Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Asch, Fein and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard E. Goldfluss, J.), entered May 3, 1983 denying petitioners’ application for the fixation of bail, deemed by the court to be a writ of habeas corpus seeking their release from detention or in the alternative fixing reasonable bail, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. The application was addressed to the felony complaint which petitioners had waived to the Supreme Court. While this appeal was pending, petitioners were indicted for crimes based on the charges specified in the underlying felony complaint. Appellants are thus no longer held pursuant to the felony complaint but instead under the Grand Jury indictment. Accordingly their objection to the original detention is academic (see People ex rel. Hodge v Fischer, 33 AD2d 956). Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Asch, Fein and Alexander, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 700, 464 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-interdonato-v-warden-executive-director-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack