People ex rel. Hunter v. Buffardi

15 A.D.3d 736, 788 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1426
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 15 A.D.3d 736 (People ex rel. Hunter v. Buffardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Hunter v. Buffardi, 15 A.D.3d 736, 788 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Peters, J.R

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Caruso, J.), entered January 20, 2004 in Schenectady County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus sought release from the Schenectady County jail on the grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel as well as the right to a speedy trial. Supreme Court summarily denied the application without a hearing and petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Neither of petitioner’s claims is properly brought via an application for a writ of habeas corpus but rather is more properly the subject of a direct appeal from the judgment of conviction or a CPL article 440 motion (see People ex rel. Barnett v Senkowski, 294 AD2d 686, 686-687 [2002]; People ex rel. Hall v Campbell, 290 AD2d 672, 673 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 601 [2002]; People ex rel. White v La Vallee, 51 AD2d 1093, 1094 [1976]). Furthermore, we find no extraordinary circumstances presented here that “warrant a departure from the prescribed orderly procedures” (People ex rel. Woodard v Senkowski, 305 AD2d 879, [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 511 [2003]).

Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Allen v. Maribel
107 A.D.3d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People ex rel. Fulton v. Lape
61 A.D.3d 1227 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Howard v. Rock
61 A.D.3d 1230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Landy v. Rock
61 A.D.3d 1198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. McDermott v. Artus
38 A.D.3d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People ex rel. Tunstall v. Miller
24 A.D.3d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People ex rel. Safran v. Filion
22 A.D.3d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 736, 788 N.Y.S.2d 871, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hunter-v-buffardi-nyappdiv-2005.