People ex rel. Hudson River Day Line v. Franck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Hudson River Day Line v. Franck

232 A.D. 779

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 779 (People ex rel. Hudson River Day Line v. Franck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Hudson River Day Line v. Franck, 232 A.D. 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, so called and entered, dismissing certiorari orders affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur upon the ground that the structures in question became land (People ex rel. International Nav. Co. v. Barker, 153 N. Y. 98) and are, therefore, assessable under section 5 of the Tax Law;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, so called and entered, dismissing certiorari orders affirmed, in so far as appealed from, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur upon the ground that the structures in question became land (People ex rel. International Nav. Co. v. Barker, 153 N. Y. 98) and are, therefore, assessable under section 5 of the Tax Law;

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hudson-river-day-line-v-franck-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack