People ex rel. Huck v. Pierce

90 Ill. 85
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 90 Ill. 85 (People ex rel. Huck v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Huck v. Pierce, 90 Ill. 85 (Ill. 1878).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an application, made to the county court by the county collector, for judgment against certain lands belonging to appellees, respectively, for certain special assessments levied by the city of Chicago for the construction of certain improvements, by which the property in question was supposed to be benefited. The application was made at the June term of the court, 1877. The return of these assessments, made by the city collector to the county collector next preceding this application, was made March 15, 1877. The assessments in question were, by their terms, due and payable more than two years prior to the first day of March, 1877.

The only objection made against the rendering of judgment in the county court was, that the assessments were barred because they were not returned to the county collector within the time required by law. In support of this position we are referred' to section 279 of the Revenue act of 1872, which provides, in substance, that any special assessment not returned to the county collector before the first day of March in the year next succeeding the first day of March next after it is due, shall be considered barred, etc.

It is provided by the constitution of 1870, art. 9, sec. 4: “ The General Assembly shall provide, in all cases where it may be necessary to sell real estate for the non-payment of taxes or special assessments for State, county, municipal or other purposes, that a return of such unpaid taxes or assessments shall be made to some general officer of the county having authority to receive State and county taxes; and there shall be no sale of said property for any of said taxes or assessments but by said officer, upon the order or judgment of some court of record.”

The Revenue act in the section relied upon by appellee, is found to have passed and been approved March 30, 1872, and went into force July 1, 1872. In relation to special assessments that act contains the following sections:

“§ 178. When any special assessments, made by any city, town or village pursuant to its charter, or by any corporate authorities, commissioners or persons pursuant to law, remain unpaid, in whole or in part, return thereof shall be made to the county collector on or before the first day of February next after the same shall have become payable, in like forms as returns are made for delinquent land taxes. County collectors shall collect, account for and pay over the same to the authorities or persons having authority to receive the same, in like manner as he is required to collect, account for and pay over taxes. The county collector may, upon return of delinquent special assessments to him, transfer the amount thereof from such returns to the tax-books in his hands, setting down therein, opposite the respective tracts or lots, iu proper columns, to be prepared for that purpose, the amounts assessed against such tract or lot.”

“§ 279. When any special assessment is not returned to the county collector on or before the first day of March next after it is due, the same may be returned on or before the first day of March in the succeeding year, and if not then returned it shall be considered barred, unless return is prevented by an injunction or order of court, and the time such return is thus prevented shall be excluded from the computation of such time.”

The provision was made in this statute for the collection of such special assessments by the county collector, in such manner as he was authorized to collect State and county taxes.

Twelve days after the approval of this statute, an act “ to provide for the incorporation of cities and villages” was approved, and this act went into force July 1, 1872. That act contains an article relating to special assessments for local improvements, entitled article 9. By section 54 of that act it was provided, that any city might, by ordinance, adopt the provisions of that article 9 without adopting the whole act • and in such case such city should “ have the right to take all proceedings in this article provided for, and have the benefit of all the provisions hereof.” The city of Chicago, by ordinance approved September 4, 1872, adopted the provisions of this article 9 in accordance with the provisions of section 54 of that article. Section 178 of the general Revenue law of March 30, 1872, was so amended May 3, 1873, as to make it applicable to special assessments^ the return of which should be made on or before the 10th day of March (instead of the 10th day of February) next after the same should become payable.

By article 9 of the act for the incorporation of cities and villages, approved April 10, 1872, it was provided, among other things:

“ § 39. It shall be the duty of the collector of special assessments, within such time as the city council or board of trustees may, by ordinance, provide, to make a report, in writing, to the general officer of the county authorized or to be designated by the general Revenue law of this State to apply for judgment and sell land for taxes due the county and State, of all the lands, town lots and real property on which he shall have been unable to collect special assessments, with the amount of special assessments due and unpaid thereon,” etc.

“ § 48. If, from any cause, any city or village shall fail to collect the whole or any portion of any special assessment which may be levied, which shall not be canceled or set aside by the order of any court, for any public improvement authorized to be made and paid for by special assessment, the city council or board of trustees may, at any time within five years after the confirmation 'of the original assessment, direct a new assessment to be made upon the delinquent property for the amount of such deficiency, and interest thereon from the date of such orig-inal assessment, which assessment shall be made, as near as may be, in the same manner as is herein prescribed for the first assessment. In all cases where partial payments shall have been made on such former assessment, they shall be credited or allowed on the new assessment to the property for which they were made, so that the assessment shall be equal and impartial in its results. If such neiv assessment prove ineffectual, either in whole or in part, the city council or board of trustees may, at any time within said five years, order a third, and so on, to be levied in the same manner and for the same purpose; and it shall constitute no legal objection to such assessment that the property may have changed hands or been encumbered subsequent to the date of the original assessment, it being the true intent and meaning of this section to make the cost and expense of all public improvements, to be paid for by special assessments, a charge upon the property assessed therefor, for the full period of five years from the confirmation of the original assessment, and for such longer period as may be required to collect, in due course of law, any new assessment ordered within that period.”

“ § 51. All special assessments levied by any city or village under this act shall, from the date of assessment, be a lien upon the real estate upon which the same may be imposed, and such lien shall continue until such special assessments are paid.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. People ex rel. West Chicago Park Commissioners
129 Ill. App. 533 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
E. A. Cummings & Co. v. People ex rel. Hanberg
213 Ill. 443 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1904)
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of Chicago
35 N.E. 881 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1893)
Linck v. City of Litchfield
31 N.E. 123 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Potwin v. Johnson
108 Ill. 70 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 Ill. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-huck-v-pierce-ill-1878.