People ex rel. Howell v. Mitchell
225 A.D.2d 491, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3247
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Petitioner’s habeas corpus application challenging the court’s revocation of his bail for violation of a temporary order of protection has been rendered moot because petitioner is no longer incarcerated and the challenged language contained in the standard order of protection has been amended by the Legislature. Accordingly, there is no need to entertain the merits of petitioner’s claim (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Howell v. Mitchell, 225 A.D.2d 491, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 491 (People ex rel. Howell v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Lassiter v. Schriro
114 A.D.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)