People ex rel. Howe v. Costello

261 A.D.2d 424, 688 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4465

This text of 261 A.D.2d 424 (People ex rel. Howe v. Costello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Howe v. Costello, 261 A.D.2d 424, 688 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals [425]*425from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), dated September 10, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel.is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD23d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 424, 688 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-howe-v-costello-nyappdiv-1999.