People Ex Rel. Hotel St. George Corporation v. Lilly

60 N.E.2d 30, 293 N.Y. 898, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2312
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 1944·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the record leads us to conclude that, as between the facts found by the Justice at Special Term, and the new findings made at the Appellate Division, the weight of evidence favors the findings made at Special Term..

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and • Desmond, J J., concur; Thaoheb, J., taking no part.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People Ex Rel. Hotel St. George Corporation v. Lilly, 60 N.E.2d 30, 293 N.Y. 898, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2312 (N.Y. 1944).

60 N.E.2d 30 (People Ex Rel. Hotel St. George Corporation v. Lilly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kiernan
49 A.D.2d 99 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Podeyn
32 A.D.2d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
People ex rel. Lincoln, Inc. v. Boyland
279 A.D. 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
People Ex Rel. Hotel Paramount Corp. v. Chambers
83 N.E.2d 839 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)
People ex rel. Hotel Paramount Corp. v. Chambers
273 A.D. 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
People ex rel. Metropolitan Jockey Club v. Mills
190 Misc. 277 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)