People ex rel. Horvay v. Board of Education

164 A.D. 930
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It affirmatively appears that the relator was dismissed for lack of work and that no one was appointed in his place, and that his name was placed in the proper position upon the civil service list. It is clear that he has no right to be reinstated in a position in which there was no work for him to do. The order appealed from must, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Horvay v. Board of Education, 164 A.D. 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

164 A.D. 930 (People ex rel. Horvay v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Kaufman v. Board of Education
166 A.D. 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)