People ex rel. Holmes v. Follette
This text of 25 A.D.2d 855 (People ex rel. Holmes v. Follette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered March 24, 1964, which dismissed the writ after a hearing and remanded him to respondent’s custody. Judgment affirmp.d, without costs. In our opinion, the delay of about nine months in imposing sentence was not long or unreasonable under the circumstances appearing in the record. (People ex rel. Harty v. Fay, 10 N Y 2d 374; People ex rel. Cassone v. Fay, 18 A D 2d 1095.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 855, 271 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-holmes-v-follette-nyappdiv-1966.