People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. McNeill
This text of 104 N.E.2d 100 (People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. McNeill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Subdivision 4 of section 588 of the Civil Prac-
tice Act authorizes an appeal directly to this court from appropriate judgments or orders “ where the only question involved on the appeal is the validity of a statutory provision of the state or of the United States under the constitution of the state or of the United States ”. The validity of no statutory provision of the State or of the United States is here involved. The rule only of the hospital is questioned. Such a rule is not a statute within the meaning of the State Constitution (cf. F. T. B. Realty Corp. v. Goodman, 300 N. Y. 140, 144, 145).
The appeal should be dismissed, without costs.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 N.E.2d 100, 303 N.Y. 464, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hirschberg-v-mcneill-ny-1952.