People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. McNeill

104 N.E.2d 100, 303 N.Y. 464, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 802
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 25, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 N.E.2d 100 (People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. McNeill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People Ex Rel. Hirschberg v. McNeill, 104 N.E.2d 100, 303 N.Y. 464, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 802 (N.Y. 1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Subdivision 4 of section 588 of the Civil Prac-

tice Act authorizes an appeal directly to this court from appropriate judgments or orders “ where the only question involved on the appeal is the validity of a statutory provision of the state or of the United States under the constitution of the state or of the United States ”. The validity of no statutory provision of the State or of the United States is here involved. The rule only of the hospital is questioned. Such a rule is not a statute within the meaning of the State Constitution (cf. F. T. B. Realty Corp. v. Goodman, 300 N. Y. 140, 144, 145).

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Figari v. New York Telephone Co.
32 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 N.E.2d 100, 303 N.Y. 464, 1952 N.Y. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hirschberg-v-mcneill-ny-1952.