People ex rel. Hill v. Artuz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Hill v. Artuz

284 A.D.2d 421, 726 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6121

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 421 (People ex rel. Hill v. Artuz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Hill v. Artuz, 284 A.D.2d 421, 726 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the [422]*422County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated August 11, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, on behalf of the relator, challenged efforts to extradite the relator to New Jersey. However, the relator was ultimately extradited to New Jersey, where he entered a plea of guilty to a charge pending against him there. Accordingly, this appeal is academic (see, People ex rel. Bilboa v Romano, 106 AD2d 595). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the [422]*422County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated August 11, 1999, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, on behalf of the relator, challenged efforts to extradite the relator to New Jersey. However, the relator was ultimately extradited to New Jersey, where he entered a plea of guilty to a charge pending against him there. Accordingly, this appeal is academic (see, People ex rel. Bilboa v Romano, 106 AD2d 595). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 421, 726 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hill-v-artuz-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack