People ex rel. Hicks v. Blackmar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Hicks v. Blackmar

176 A.D. 933

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.D. 933 (People ex rel. Hicks v. Blackmar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Hicks v. Blackmar, 176 A.D. 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

It appears by the answering affidavit that the justice, having a discretion regarding his calendar, marked this cause off for the term in view of the probable duration of the trial. This did not deprive the parties of their right, under section 990 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to a trial in Kings county at a following Special Term. Motion for writ of mandamus denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appears by the answering affidavit that the justice, having a discretion regarding his calendar, marked this cause off for the term in view of the probable duration of the trial. This did not deprive the parties of their right, under section 990 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to a trial in Kings county at a following Special Term. Motion for writ of mandamus denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D. 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hicks-v-blackmar-nyappdiv-1917.