People ex rel. Heyward v. Fay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Heyward v. Fay

20 A.D.2d 731, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 731 (People ex rel. Heyward v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Heyward v. Fay, 20 A.D.2d 731, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

—■ On February 10, 1964 this court handed down its decision on this appeal, affirming an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. On the following day the court received a letter from appellant in which he seeks to substitute his brief pro se in lieu of the brief previously submitted by his assigned counsel. The appellant’s letter will be treated as a motion for reargument. The motion is granted. The appeal is directed to be placed on the calendar for the April Term, commencing March 30, 1964, for reargument. Appellant is directed to file two copies of his typewritten brief pro se and to serve one copy upon the Attorney-General of the State of New York on or before March 16, 1964. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—■ On February 10, 1964 this court handed down its decision on this appeal, affirming an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. On the following day the court received a letter from appellant in which he seeks to substitute his brief pro se in lieu of the brief previously submitted by his assigned counsel. The appellant’s letter will be treated as a motion for reargument. The motion is granted. The appeal is directed to be placed on the calendar for the April Term, commencing March 30, 1964, for reargument. Appellant is directed to file two copies of his typewritten brief pro se and to serve one copy upon the Attorney-General of the State of New York on or before March 16, 1964. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 731, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-heyward-v-fay-nyappdiv-1964.