People ex rel. Hendricks v. Superior Court

19 Wend. 100
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Wend. 100 (People ex rel. Hendricks v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Hendricks v. Superior Court, 19 Wend. 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

Opinion

[101]*101By the Court,

Bronson, J.

This was a vexatious and oppressive proceeding to make costs, and not a fair and hona fide attempt to enforce a legal right. The defendants also, when prepared and ready to pay the specie, were purposely misled. None of the facts are denied by the relator. The superior court, therefore, were well warranted in the order made, and are fully supported by the case of Johnson v. Houlditch, 1 Burr. 578, where the plaintiff having kept out of the way to avoid a tender, the court turned the plaintiff out .of court without costs.

Motion for mandamus denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hendricks-v-superior-court-nysupct-1838.