People ex rel. Heiser v. Gilon

22 N.Y.S. 238, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 825
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that the board of assessors should •be required to give a bill of particulars of the items composing the aggregate award, or to state the methods by which they have arrived at their conclusion.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Heiser v. Gilon, 22 N.Y.S. 238, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 825 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

22 N.Y.S. 238 (People ex rel. Heiser v. Gilon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Astor v. Stillings
68 Misc. 55 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)