People ex rel. Hawkins v. Netzel
This text of 187 A.D.2d 1043 (People ex rel. Hawkins v. Netzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s contention that he was denied a timely final parole revocation proceeding is without merit. Excluding the periods of delay chargeable to petitioner, the final hearing was conducted within the 90-day period and was, therefore, timely (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [i]; People ex rel. Walker v Richardson, 174 AD2d 1061, 1062; People ex rel. Smith v Meloni, 142 AD2d 959). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Boehm, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 A.D.2d 1043, 592 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hawkins-v-netzel-nyappdiv-1992.