People ex rel. Hawkins v. Netzel

187 A.D.2d 1043, 592 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166

This text of 187 A.D.2d 1043 (People ex rel. Hawkins v. Netzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Hawkins v. Netzel, 187 A.D.2d 1043, 592 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s contention that he was denied a timely final parole revocation proceeding is without merit. Excluding the periods of delay chargeable to petitioner, the final hearing was conducted within the 90-day period and was, therefore, timely (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [i]; People ex rel. Walker v Richardson, 174 AD2d 1061, 1062; People ex rel. Smith v Meloni, 142 AD2d 959). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Boehm, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Smith v. Meloni
142 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People ex rel. Walker v. Richardson
174 A.D.2d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 A.D.2d 1043, 592 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hawkins-v-netzel-nyappdiv-1992.