People ex rel. Haugens v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

People ex rel. Haugens v. Chicago & Alton Railroad

120 N.E. 454, 285 Ill. 232

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 21, 1918

DocketNo. 11764

StatusPublished

This text of 120 N.E. 454 (People ex rel. Haugens v. Chicago & Alton Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Haugens v. Chicago & Alton Railroad, 120 N.E. 454, 285 Ill. 232 (Ill. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Cooke

delivered the opinion of the court:

The county collector of Marshall county made application at the June term, 1917, of the county court for judgment and order of sale against the lands of appellees for delinquent high school taxes for High School District No. 10, in Marshall county. This high school district was organized under the act of 1911, which has been held to be invalid. The only matters presented to the trial court were the validity of the tax levy and the effect of the validating act of June 14, 1917. The application was made after the passage of the validating act of June 14, 1917, and when objections were filed by appellees that the district, having been organized under the act of 1911; was invalid, the county collector moved to strike the objections upon the ground that the curative act had validated the district and legalized the acts of the board of education. The county court denied the motion and sustained the objections, and the collector has perfected this appeal.

Quo warranto proceedings had been instituted in the circuit court of Marshall county, and on March 5, 1917, a judgment of ouster was entered therein, which judgment, on review by writ of error, has been reversed by this court. People v. Wright, 284 Ill. 339.

We have held that the curative act of June 14, 1917, legalized the districts organized in the manner in which this district was organized; (People v. Madison, 280 Ill. 96; People v. Stitt, id. 553; People v. Fifer, id. 506; People v. Ryan, 281 id. 231; People v. Craft, 282 id. 483;) and we have also held that the curative act validated taxes levied by high school districts organized in the manner in which this district was organized. People v. Mathews, 282 Ill. 85; People v. New York Central Railroad Co. id. 11; Peoples. Kessler, id. 16; People v. New York Central Railroad Co. id. 19.

For the reasons given in the cases cited, the judgment of the county court is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to overrule the objections.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Cooke

delivered the opinion of the court:

The county collector of Marshall county made application at the June term, 1917, of the county court for judgment and order of sale against the lands of appellees for delinquent high school taxes for High School District No. 10, in Marshall county. This high school district was organized under the act of 1911, which has been held to be invalid. The only matters presented to the trial court were the validity of the tax levy and the effect of the validating act of June 14, 1917. The application was made after the passage of the validating act of June 14, 1917, and when objections were filed by appellees that the district, having been organized under the act of 1911; was invalid, the county collector moved to strike the objections upon the ground that the curative act had validated the district and legalized the acts of the board of education. The county court denied the motion and sustained the objections, and the collector has perfected this appeal.

Quo warranto proceedings had been instituted in the circuit court of Marshall county, and on March 5, 1917, a judgment of ouster was entered therein, which judgment, on review by writ of error, has been reversed by this court. People v. Wright, 284 Ill. 339.

We have held that the curative act of June 14, 1917, legalized the districts organized in the manner in which this district was organized; (People v. Madison, 280 Ill. 96; People v. Stitt, id. 553; People v. Fifer, id. 506; People v. Ryan, 281 id. 231; People v. Craft, 282 id. 483;) and we have also held that the curative act validated taxes levied by high school districts organized in the manner in which this district was organized. People v. Mathews, 282 Ill. 85; People v. New York Central Railroad Co. id. 11; Peoples. Kessler, id. 16; People v. New York Central Railroad Co. id. 19.

For the reasons given in the cases cited, the judgment of the county court is reversed and the cause is remanded, with directions to overrule the objections.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.E. 454, 285 Ill. 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-haugens-v-chicago-alton-railroad-ill-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack