People ex rel. Hatterson v. Walters
This text of 100 A.D.2d 978 (People ex rel. Hatterson v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered September 20, 1982, which sustained the petition, vacated a parole detainer warrant lodged against petitioner and directed that he be restored to parole status. H Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and [979]*979proceeding dismissed. H A final revocation hearing was held within the 90-day period prescribed by the Executive Law (Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 3, par [f], cl [i]). Since petitioner, upon waiving extradition and upon his return to this State from North Carolina, waived his right to a preliminary parole revocation hearing, he effectively waived his right to challenge the Parole Board’s alleged failure to afford him a timely preliminary revocation hearing as well as his right to relief as a result of any failure to do so (People ex rel. Miller v Walters, 60 NY2d 899, 901). Accordingly, the proceeding should have been dismissed. Mangano, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 A.D.2d 978, 475 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hatterson-v-walters-nyappdiv-1984.