People ex rel. Hastings v. Hofstadter
235 A.D. 630
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People ex rel. Hastings v. Hofstadter. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 A.D. 388 →
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Should the relator’s motion in this proceeding to quash the subpoena have been granted? Stay of proceeding granted to and including Thursday, January twenty-first, to enable appellant to make application to the Court of Appeals or a judge thereof for a further stay or for a hearing forthwith. Present —- Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Hastings v. Hofstadter, 235 A.D. 630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 630 (People ex rel. Hastings v. Hofstadter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.