People ex rel. Hartford & Connecticut Western Railroad v. Frost

10 N.Y. St. Rep. 878
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.Y. St. Rep. 878 (People ex rel. Hartford & Connecticut Western Railroad v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Hartford & Connecticut Western Railroad v. Frost, 10 N.Y. St. Rep. 878 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Pratt, J.

—There is no reason to doubt that the assessors discharged their duties with fairness, and exercised due dilligence to learn the value of the property subject to their action. There is no evidence of any prejudice again-t the relators, and no reason to suppose that the property of the railroad has been valued at a higher rate than other property in the town. Equality in taxation is the result to be sought, and when it exists, no ground for interference is shown.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Dykman, J., concurs; Barnard, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.Y. St. Rep. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hartford-connecticut-western-railroad-v-frost-nysupct-1887.