People ex rel. Harris v. New York State Parole Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Harris v. New York State Parole Board

272 A.D.2d 856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 856 (People ex rel. Harris v. New York State Parole Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Harris v. New York State Parole Board, 272 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by relator from an order of the Clinton Special Term of the Supreme Court, dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. Relator was convicted on January 18, 1927, for the crime of manslaughter, second degree, and was sentenced to imprisonment for ■a term of not Iess. than seven years and six months, and not more than fifteen [857]*857years. While serving this sentence in Sing Sing Prison, the relator committed a second homicide and was indicted for first degree murder and after trial was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, first degree, for which he was sentenced to a definite term of twenty years. It is relator’s contention that he has been unjustly deprived of the privilege of parole under his first sentence. Order affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by relator from an order of the Clinton Special Term of the Supreme Court, dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. Relator was convicted on January 18, 1927, for the crime of manslaughter, second degree, and was sentenced to imprisonment for ■a term of not Iess. than seven years and six months, and not more than fifteen [857]*857years. While serving this sentence in Sing Sing Prison, the relator committed a second homicide and was indicted for first degree murder and after trial was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, first degree, for which he was sentenced to a definite term of twenty years. It is relator’s contention that he has been unjustly deprived of the privilege of parole under his first sentence. Order affirmed, without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-harris-v-new-york-state-parole-board-nyappdiv-1947.