People ex rel. Harris v. Fischer

53 A.D.3d 632, 860 N.Y.S.2d 752
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 A.D.3d 632 (People ex rel. Harris v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Harris v. Fischer, 53 A.D.3d 632, 860 N.Y.S.2d 752 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), dated September 28, 2006, which denied, without a hearing, the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner was convicted of robbery in the first degree in Queens County in December 1990 and was sentenced on January 17, 1991, to a term of 6 to 18 years incarceration. After he had been under parole supervision for 5 years, the petitioner was rearrested in Suffolk County in January 2005, and pleaded guilty to assault in the first degree. On September 26, 2005, he was sentenced, as a second violent felony offender, to an 11-year determinate sentence, to be followed by 5 years of post-release supervision.

The petitioner filed the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting that officials from the Department of Correctional Services (hereinafter DOCS) improperly had deemed his 2005 sentence to run consecutively rather than concurrently to his 1991 sentence, and that he was entitled to immediate release from custody.

Even if the petitioner were to prevail on his argument that DOCS improperly deemed his 2005 sentence to run consecutively to his 1991 sentence, the petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release from prison and, thus, habeas corpus relief is [633]*633unavailable (see People ex rel. Burr v Duncan, 289 AD2d 898 [2001]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Spolzino, J.E, Angiolillo, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lilley v. James
22 Misc. 3d 456 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
People ex rel. Porter v. Napoli
56 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 A.D.3d 632, 860 N.Y.S.2d 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-harris-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2008.