People ex rel. Harris v. Dalsheim
This text of 69 A.D.2d 911 (People ex rel. Harris v. Dalsheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 1, 1978, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Although a 15-month delay existed between the time a warrant was sent to North Carolina authorities to obtain petitioner, who had absconded, and the lodging of such warrant, petitioner was not deprived of his due process rights to a prompt parole revocation hearing. Petitioner could have acted on his own initiative to expedite matters, and his defense to the charge of parole violation was in no way prejudiced by the delay. Respondents sent the warrant soon after discovering petitioner’s whereabouts and monitored the situation in a reasonable manner. Under these circumstances, petitioner, the cause of the problem in the first instance, cannot be heard to complain of the delay (see People ex rel. Flores v Dalsheim, 66 AD2d 381). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.2d 911, 415 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-harris-v-dalsheim-nyappdiv-1979.