People ex rel. Harden v. McMann

31 A.D.2d 666, 295 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676

Opinion

Aulisi, J.

Reargument of appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered February 18, 1967, in Clinton County, which denied a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and (2) an order of the same court, entered May 8, 3967, in Clinton County, which denied the motion by relator for reargument of his original application (see 30 A D 2d 641). The denial of relator’s application for a copy of the trial transcript which had already been provided to his assigned counsel neither deprived him of his right to an effective appeal nor his right to effective counsel upon such appeal (see United States ex rel. Garcia v. Martin, 271 F. 2d 298; United States ex rel. Hicks v. Fay, 230 F. Supp. 942; People v. Pitts, 6 N Y 2d 288). On reargument the court adheres to the original determination. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Harden v. McMann, 31 A.D.2d 666, 295 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

31 A.D.2d 666 (People ex rel. Harden v. McMann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Hicks v. Fay
230 F. Supp. 942 (S.D. New York, 1964)
United States ex rel. Garcia v. Martin
271 F.2d 298 (Second Circuit, 1959)