People ex rel. Harden v. McMann

31 A.D.2d 666, 295 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676

This text of 31 A.D.2d 666 (People ex rel. Harden v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Harden v. McMann, 31 A.D.2d 666, 295 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Aulisi, J.

Reargument of appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered February 18, 1967, in Clinton County, which denied a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and (2) an order of the same court, entered May 8, 3967, in Clinton County, which denied the motion by relator for reargument of his original application (see 30 A D 2d 641). The denial of relator’s application for a copy of the trial transcript which had already been provided to his assigned counsel neither deprived him of his right to an effective appeal nor his right to effective counsel upon such appeal (see United States ex rel. Garcia v. Martin, 271 F. 2d 298; United States ex rel. Hicks v. Fay, 230 F. Supp. 942; People v. Pitts, 6 N Y 2d 288). On reargument the court adheres to the original determination. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Ex Rel. Hicks v. Fay
230 F. Supp. 942 (S.D. New York, 1964)
United States ex rel. Garcia v. Martin
271 F.2d 298 (Second Circuit, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 666, 295 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-harden-v-mcmann-nyappdiv-1968.