People ex rel. Hammer v. Keane

171 A.D.2d 895
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered March 6, 1989, as granted the petition to the extent of holding that the petitioner’s State sentence continued to run while he was incarcerated pursuant to a Federal conviction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by [896]*896Justice Colabella at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Hammer v. Keane, 171 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

171 A.D.2d 895 (People ex rel. Hammer v. Keane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Pughe v. Parrott
302 A.D.2d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)