People ex rel. Hammer v. Keane

171 A.D.2d 895
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 A.D.2d 895 (People ex rel. Hammer v. Keane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Hammer v. Keane, 171 A.D.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered March 6, 1989, as granted the petition to the extent of holding that the petitioner’s State sentence continued to run while he was incarcerated pursuant to a Federal conviction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by [896]*896Justice Colabella at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Hooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Pughe v. Parrott
302 A.D.2d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hammer-v-keane-nyappdiv-1991.