People ex rel. Halsted v. Superior Court

19 Wend. 701
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1839·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Cowen, J.

The mandamus cannot be granted. This court cannot control the discretion exercised by the court below. Besides it is not perceived why it was not fitly exercised. The stay is only temporary, until the determination of the replevin suit. It was fully competent to the court to make the order.

Mandamus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Halsted v. Superior Court, 19 Wend. 701 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).

19 Wend. 701 (People ex rel. Halsted v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex parte Scudder-Gale Grocery Co.
120 Ala. 434 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
People ex rel. Storey v. Knickerbocker
2 N.E. 507 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1885)