People ex rel. Hallock v. Sleight

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632 (People ex rel. Hallock v. Sleight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Hallock v. Sleight, 9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Opinion

Talcott, J.:

This proceeding is an attempt to review the judgment rendered by a Justices’ Court, by means of a common law certiorari. The [633]*633certiorari appears to have been issued without any application for the same, or any allowance by the court, but merely at the option of the attorney of the party against whom judgment was rendered in the Justices’ Court, and for the reason that the time for appealing had expired. The writ must be quashed. It is expressly provided by law, that the only mode of reviewing such judgments is by appeal, as provided in chapter 5 of the Code of Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-hallock-v-sleight-nysupct-1874.