People ex rel. Hackett v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit

36 Mich. 334, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 143
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1877·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Marston, J:

Within the principles of previous decisions of this court, we are of opinion that a party should not be deprived of his personal liberty upon an affidavit which merely states ’conclusions upon information and belief. The facts and circumstances should be set forth in detail, so that when presented to an officer to fix hail, he can exercise some judgment based upcm the facts, and not the conclusions of the affiant merely. A creditor may think he has good reason to believe that he has a cause of action against another, when if the facts were fully set forth, it might appear otherwise.—Const., Art. VI, § 26; Josselyn v. McAllister, 25 Mich., 45; Matter of Stephenson, 32 Mich., 60.

The writ must be denied, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Hackett v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit, 36 Mich. 334, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 143 (Mich. 1877).

36 Mich. 334 (People ex rel. Hackett v. Judge of the Wayne Circuit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Littlestown Savings Institution v. Bream
121 S.E. 169 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1924)
Brown v. Hadwin
148 N.W. 693 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Martin v. Saginaw Circuit Judge
138 N.W. 273 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Kaeppler v. Red River Valley National Bank
79 N.W. 869 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1899)
Graham v. Cass Circuit Judge
66 N.W. 348 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
People v. Heffron
19 N.W. 170 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Sheridan v. Briggs
19 N.W. 189 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Swart v. Kimball
5 N.W. 635 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)
Fish ex rel. Smith v. Barbour
4 N.W. 502 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)