People ex rel. Gross v. Walsh
This text of 213 A.D. 878 (People ex rel. Gross v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Final order reversed upon the law and the facts. While this proceeding appears to have been properly brought under article 5, section 20, of the Zoning Law (People ex rel. Smith v. Walsh, 211 App. Div. 205; affd., by the Court of Appeals, 240 N. Y. 606; People ex rel. Small v. Walsh, 212 App. Div. 883), we are not satisfied from the record before us that practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships have been shown sufficently to justify the order of the board of appeals. We, therefore, remit the proceeding to the Special Term to take testimony and determine the question as to whether practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships existed justifying the variance under section 20. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-gross-v-walsh-nyappdiv-1925.