People ex rel. Gross v. Walsh

213 A.D. 878
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Final order reversed upon the law and the facts. While this proceeding appears to have been properly brought under article 5, section 20, of the Zoning Law (People ex rel. Smith v. Walsh, 211 App. Div. 205; affd., by the Court of Appeals, 240 N. Y. 606; People ex rel. Small v. Walsh, 212 App. Div. 883), we are not satisfied from the record before us that practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships have been shown sufficently to justify the order of the board of appeals. We, therefore, remit the proceeding to the Special Term to take testimony and determine the question as to whether practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships existed justifying the variance under section 20. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Gross v. Walsh, 213 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

213 A.D. 878 (People ex rel. Gross v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitton v. Town of Ballston
289 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Sena v. Gallagher
11 Misc. 2d 718 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)