People ex rel. Gridley v. Hendee

64 N.E. 1071, 199 Ill. 55
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 64 N.E. 1071 (People ex rel. Gridley v. Hendee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Gridley v. Hendee, 64 N.E. 1071, 199 Ill. 55 (Ill. 1902).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Carter

delivered the opinion of the court:

The circuit court of Lake county sustained a demurrer to the petition of the relator, George N. Gridley, supervisor of assessments of Lake county, for a writ of man-damns to compel appellee, Albert L. Hendee, county clerk of said county, to provide duplicate assessors’ books for the several townships and assessment districts of said county for the assessment of personal .property. The relator stood by his petition, and final judgment was rendered. This appeal was then taken.

Counsel for appellant says: “The real point in this cause is whether, under the act of 1898 ‘for the assessment of property and providing the means therefor, ’ it is the duty of the county clerk to prepare and furnish to the supervisor of assessments duplicate assessment books for personal property as well as real property, and that the assessment of personal property shall be made in the same books with the real. We insist that the statute requires the furnishing of the duplicate books for both personal and real property; the appellee contends otherwise.” He also says that the appeal was taken in this case because the case relates to the revenue and because the State is interested, “as a party or otherwise.” But we have held that in order to give this court jurisdiction in a direct appeal from the trial court on the ground that the case relates to the revenue, it “must relate to the revenue directly, and not merely incidentally or remotely.” (Wells v. Rogers, 196 Ill. 292.) It cannot'be held that this case relates to the revenue directly. It only involves a construction of the statute to determine whether or not the county clerk is required to make and deliver to the supervisor of assessments duplicate assessment books for the assessment of personal property. No more can it be said that the State is interested in the case, as a party or otherwise.

Having no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, it must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Waukegan v. Drobnick
202 N.E.2d 519 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1964)
Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. County of Cook
46 N.E.2d 35 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1943)
People ex rel. Nelson v. Bank of Rushville
271 Ill. App. 130 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1933)
People Ex Rel. Rexses v. Cermak
148 N.E. 382 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)
Knight v. Partridge Drainage District
102 N.E. 199 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1913)
City of Chicago v. County of Cook
79 N.E. 571 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1906)
Sumner v. Village of Milford
112 Ill. App. 623 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)
People v. Hendee
108 Ill. App. 591 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.E. 1071, 199 Ill. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-gridley-v-hendee-ill-1902.