People ex rel. Greenwaldt v. Infante

87 A.D.2d 904, 449 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16427
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 904 (People ex rel. Greenwaldt v. Infante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Greenwaldt v. Infante, 87 A.D.2d 904, 449 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Clyne, J.), entered November 9,1981, which dismissed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. Petitioner was convicted on September 24,1980 of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and [905]*905sentenced as a persistent felon to an indeterminate term of 15 years to life. An appeal was immediately filed but has not yet been perfected. On July 20,1981, petitioner applied for a writ of habeas corpus. As justification for the issuance of a writ, defendant contended that the trial court had improperly ordered him to produce a handwriting sample during trial and that he was incorrectly determined to be a persistent felony offender. Petitioner’s application was dismissed following a hearing, and the instant appeal ensued. While an appeal is pending, a writ of habeas corpus is available only where considerations of practicality and necessity so dictate (People ex rel. Keitt v McMann, 18 NY2d 257, 262). The writ does not serve as a substitute for an appeal where, as here, all that is alleged are errors occurring at trial. Since these errors may be directly reviewed on the pending appeal and there is no compelling reason to separately examine them in this proceeding {People ex rel. Palmer v LeFevre, 72 AD2d 618), the judgment dismissing the petition should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. McNair v. Bantum
123 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People ex rel. Davis v. Coombe
97 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People ex rel. World v. Jones
88 A.D.2d 1096 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.2d 904, 449 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-greenwaldt-v-infante-nyappdiv-1982.