People ex rel. Green v. Warden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Green v. Warden

255 A.D.2d 241, 680 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12676

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 241 (People ex rel. Green v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Green v. Warden, 255 A.D.2d 241, 680 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.), rendered on or about February 19, 1997, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Relator’s appeal from the denial of his writ of habeas corpus is moot since he has been convicted after trial and sentenced. Moreover, a writ of habeas corpus is inappropriate to review issues which relator may raise on his direct appeal from his judgment after trial. We have considered relator’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.), rendered on or about February 19, 1997, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Relator’s appeal from the denial of his writ of habeas corpus is moot since he has been convicted after trial and sentenced. Moreover, a writ of habeas corpus is inappropriate to review issues which relator may raise on his direct appeal from his judgment after trial. We have considered relator’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 241, 680 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-green-v-warden-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack