People ex rel. Grant v. Warden

19 A.D.3d 223, 796 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6708

This text of 19 A.D.3d 223 (People ex rel. Grant v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Grant v. Warden, 19 A.D.3d 223, 796 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6708 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Ambrecht, J.), entered September 4, 2003, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

We have considered the arguments raised in petitioner’s pro se supplemental brief and find them without merit. Concur— Marlow, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 223, 796 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-grant-v-warden-nyappdiv-2005.